With Battlefield 3, and Battlefield 4 eventually, it felt like DICE had found the sweet spot of a setting that was both natural and feature-rich. The community wasn’t particularly excited over diving back into WWII warfare (especially considering historical inaccuracies and deviations in Battlefield V), and the best solution for the next game would be a return to a modern setting. This way DICE can at least sparkle the hope Battlefield 6 won’t be abandoned halfway through its life cycle.įurthermore, DICE should listen to players more to understand their desires. Test servers should definitely return and should be included in the official announcement of the next game when it is finally revealed. This incredible way of interaction was surprisingly absent in Battlefield V after it had been a part of the franchise for a long period.
![battlefield 5 review battlefield 5 review](https://gamecravings.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BattlefieldFirestorm5-1024x576.jpg)
Again, there’s a working solution to that in DICE’s history, which is CTE – Community Test Environment. The best way to do that is to openly communicate with the player base. Regaining player loyalty should become the top priority for the studio. The most disappointing part of the Battlefield V life cycle was the terminated support, which happened far too early and felt like a betrayal to many fans of the franchise. DICE could also start exploring legendary battles of WWII and offering new maps on a monthly basis, which would engage the community in the long-term and ease the wait for major expansions.
#Battlefield 5 review download
With Battlefield V, DICE could have at least tried to stick to the initial roadmap and fulfill given promises. They could have set the game's Firestorm aside as a free-to-play download and concentrating on the core game and quality-of-life features, many of which fans had asked for multiple times. What DICE Should Have Done For Battlefield 5 A complete disaster overflown with bugs upon its release, the game managed to come up to the surface thanks to continuous post-launch support, eventually growing into one of the best titles in the franchise. DICE has an exemplary case in their very own portfolio: Battlefield 4. However, no matter how bad a video game is, there’s always a chance to improve it. Related: Battlefield V Completes Its Run of Consistent Disappointments When all of these issues are combined, the shamefully low quality of Battlefield V was clear.
![battlefield 5 review battlefield 5 review](https://cdn.cgmagonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/battlefield-v-pc-review-3.jpg)
Ironically, the scarce updates Battlefield V did receive somehow led to a plethora of new technical problems. Moreover, some of the anticipated features never made it to the game, like the notorious 5v5 Competitive mode. DICE had a release schedule for planned additional content and expansions which the company never stuck to, resulting in long intervals between content drops. Starting with a turbulent and controversial release, Battlefield V never managed to live up to players’ expectations and received an unexpectedly early death. Battlefield V ended up being a failure, and DICE should learn a valuable lesson from the game’s disappointing run to ensure their next title avoids the same fate, because it's likely they won't have the luxury of letting Battlefield’s community down one more time.